September 21, 2021

Realty Law Digest | New York Law Journal - Law.com

Scott Mollen, Partner at Herrick, Feinstein LLP
Scott Mollen, Partner at Herrick, Feinstein LLP

A defendant moved for partial summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s claims with respect to six properties that were at issue (properties). The plaintiff opposed the defendant’s motion and cross-moved for an order dismissing the defendant’s “second and third affirmative defenses of Statute of Limitations (SOL) and laches….”

The plaintiff was a “partner/investor” with the defendant in a series of partnerships whose purpose was to “purchase, improve and sell certain real estate.” The “specific terms of the partnerships were oral, not written.” The defendant was to make “improvements” to the properties. The parties had agreed that the defendant would be reimbursed for expenses incurred in making such improvements. The parties were to “split any profits remaining from the sale proceeds.”

Want to continue reading?
Become an ALM Digital Reader for Free!

Benefits of a Digital Membership

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

Already have an account? Sign In Now

*May exclude premium content



source: https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2021/09/21/realty-law-digest-211/

Your content is great. However, if any of the content contained herein violates any rights of yours, including those of copyright, please contact us immediately by e-mail at media[@]kissrpr.com.