Scholars blocked from testifying against Florida's voter-suppression law - MSNBC
Florida officials took great pride in how well their system of elections performed in 2020. But as we've discussed, that didn't stop Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and GOP state legislators from putting new hurdles between voters and their democracy anyway — in part because they could, in part to give themselves an added electoral advantage, and in part because the GOP believes it must enact policies in line with the party's Trumpian conspiracy theories.
With this in mind, the governor in May singed into law a series of new voter-suppression measures, which took effect immediately and will be in place for the Sunshine State's busy 2022 election cycle.
Not surprisingly, Florida Republicans' new anti-voting policies are being challenged in the courts, and under normal circumstances, we'd expect to see some of the state's leading scholars offering expert testimony, explaining in detail the effects of the new state statutes.
As The Miami Herald reported, however, the current circumstances are anything but normal.
The professors' dean said that the scholars' testimony "may pose a conflict of interest to the executive branch of the state of Florida create a conflict for the University of Florida."
It's an odd argument. It'd be one thing if a lawyer for the governor was prepared to give testimony about a law his employer/client had signed into law, but in this instance, we're talking about university professors who operate independently from DeSantis' office.
Recommended
To see a "conflict" is to suggest the university's professors are somehow an extension of the DeSantis administration. They are not.
Indeed, one of the scholars testified — with the University of Florida's permission — in two voting rights cases against Florida's Republican-led government in 2018.
The New York Times added, "Leading experts on academic freedom said they knew of no similar restrictions on professors' speech and testimony and said the action was probably unconstitutional."
The professors are now represented by counsel, and it's likely that we haven't heard the end of this story. Among the questions in need of answers is how the university arrived at this decision, whether the school feared political retaliation, and whether anyone in state government leaned on university officials before the decision was made.
source: https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/scholars-blocked-testifying-against-florida-s-voter-suppression-law-n1282848
Your content is great. However, if any of the content contained herein violates any rights of yours, including those of copyright, please contact us immediately by e-mail at media[@]kissrpr.com.